Druff asserted on NWP radio that the PPA has been totally ineffective in its efforts to support onliine poker. I strongly disagree.
I think that Todd may not understand how lobbying works in Washington, D.C.
Although the PPA hasn't been able to explicitly legalize internet poker yet, it has brought the issue to the attention of prominent legislators. That alone is a big win. Barney Frank, for example, is probably well acquainted with the PPA, and I wouldn't be surprised if he crafts his proposed bills on poker in consultation with the PPA. It is common for lobbyists to actually write the text of proposed legislation.
What about the recent (partial, admittedly) victories in state courts in Kentucky, South Carolina, Pennsylvania and elsewhere? It is my understanding that the PPA provided financial and strategic support to those efforts.
Druff went on to say that it's wrongheaded to take the tack that poker is a game of skill and that since poker involves "gambling," that that argument won't matter.
Again, I disagree. Most state laws prohibiting gambling explicitly cite "games of chance." Hence, if you can establish that poker is a game of skill, those laws won't apply.
Lobbying is like pouring water over a stone, it takes time. Except, in this case, the water is money, and the stones are boneheaded congressmen, prosecutors, and their lackeys.
Obviously, the latest development out of the U.S. attorney's office in NY sucks. It's important that there is a lobbying organization to fight against this patently cynical money grab by a maverick prosecutor.