No Moms

I was thinking about MJ the other day and how he had those kids with out the mother being involved.

The first one (maybe the second too, I don't rem) the kid knew who the parent was (Debbie Rowe), the second and third no one knows who the mother is. Well Debbie Rowe definitely came back to bite him even though he took every precaution to make sure she couldn't.

On the last kid he did it right.


So it got me to thinking that this is actually the best way to do it if, and this is a big if, if you are a stable (MJ wasn't) wealthy man who wants to have kids. Advantages below...

1. I mean why have two variables making very important decisions about raising the kids? It just causes conflict and the constant push and pull between the parents about whos turn it is, I did it last time, you aren't spending enough time with the kids etc... Is so detrimental to kids. Any tension between parents is horrible for kids.

2. You don't have to worry about some woman taking your kid from you. No shared rights, no visitation, no moms new boy friend fucking your kid in the ass, no moms new boy friend raising your kid, no mom using your kids against you and turning them against you, etc...

3. No child support

What could be seen as disadvantages..

1. No mother figure. Well the divorce rate is at 60% and of the 40% that stay married I would argue they are still on avg doing more damage to thier kids than this situation could. I mean almost every person I know has mommy and daddy issues on some level. Don't forget you would have an au pair that is very loving but not in quite the same way as a real mother and wouldn't play herself of as filling that role. But the kids would still have a strong female figure in their life, not to mention the other women around you.

2. Thats the only one and I don't think it is any less harmful than what happens in a typical kids life in todays households.




Obviously this route doesn't include marriage, but who the fuck is dumb enough to do that (I was 25 and got very lucky with my girl and it still isn't peaches and cream). There is no reason or advantage to get married period. It's just people being insecure and locking each other up through legal and financial means.

In my scenario you could still have long term committed relations with women. Obv you wouldn't introduce every slut to your kids, but the ones you did would obv have to be loving to your children and be cool with it. Don't forget these women know that you will never have kids with them since your shit would be snipped (with sperm saved if you wanted to have more, but not with any girl you know) and they would also know you were never going to marry them.

I know most of you think that a person living this way would never get girls but that is just you being insecure. If a girl likes you it is over. You can pee on them and beat them every morn and they will still love you. Now imagine if you treat them great.

This post has been edited by ucntcmebch: Oct 26 2009, 04:35 PM

Solid thread ucnt

He wasn't the biological father of any of the kids. They're whiter than Serial Fail. In principle I like your idea, though wealthy is the key. Wealthy enough to have 1 hot nanny, and 1 nanny to actually take care of the kids. Thw whole problem is most that are wealthy enough to be in that situation are having kids late in life making dying before they're raised a distinct possibility, no alive grandparents a likely possibility, and no one to raise them. Then you have to worry about some fucked up drunken uncle trying to raise your kids to rape their trust fund.

I am not sure if MJ was the biological father or not. I don't think that has been proven or even that there is good info to go on. Your right they do look to white but I am still on the fence.

I have been rethinking the wealthy part. I mean the variables we know in this equation is that you no doubt need an au pair who lives with you, you need to be able to afford to raise a child and provide it shelter. But past that what are we really talking about? I mean if your a single guy making 100K a year I think you could pull this off. If you looked at how many guys making 100K or more get married each year I think that this what millions should be doing.

I don't think anyone should have a mother involved in their kids life if you are making over a 100K a year.

Obv that means your not getting married either.

Getting married is for poor people period and then I would advise against it bec you have a good chance to end up poorer.

I mean if your making 100K a year I could argue that getting married gives you a better chance to end up poorer than getting a wife who might make some money and add to your wealth.

Is this the deep thinking type of shit you supposedly come up with Ucnt? Probably the dumbest thing I have ever read on here. Buster was obv right with his evaluation on you. Major, major mommy and daddy issues. Honestly I'm glad I don't live in the same state as you seeing that you are most likely destined to go on some murderous shooting spree at your local mall or church. I have never in my life seen such a feeble minded idiot that thinks he is so far above everyone else. It's truly disgusting, dangerous and mind boggling at the same time.

At any rate, I have a question for you... You tell everyone that doesn't like to read your constant garbage to put you on ignore. Fair enough, but here lies the huge hypocrisy with Ucntcmebch. You could just as easily ignore anything and everything involved with sports talk, yet you constantly interject and spout your broken record bullshit to numerous members on here. Do you not see how much of a hypocrite that makes you? Probably not, and that right there is one of the big reasons why you are truly a moron. I'm sure you will reply to this in your usual gay numbered fashion with bolded sentences that really have no relevance as to what we're talking about. As usual you will probably make retarded excuses and say it's different, but trust me it isn't, and everyone on here sees that except for you.

Seriously, do you ever stop to wonder why EVERYONE on this site thinks of you as a moronic blabbering piece of shit? Do you think it's just a coincidence?

We have a trifecta of mods acting like morons this week I see. I broke up your post and numbered mine accordingly so that we can be more clear.

1. That doesn't mean anything to anyone. You always just speak in generalities so that yu don't have to make specific points.

2. I have the least mommy and daddy issues of anyone I know or have met. Don't forget that buster doesn't know me and was really writing that for entertainment purposes not to be factually correct or be really deep. This is you just grasping at straws, hoping something sticks. Just because the traditional family doesn't make sense anymore doesn't mean I have issues born from the shitty system.

3. Doesn't mean anything. Just you trying to be outrageous and shocking.

4. Feeble minded? In one through 4 so far you haven't said anything.

5. The difference is I don't want to ignore it. I think it is unbelievably interesting that in the face of clear facts that people will just ignore them and keep doing dumb shit. Not only will they do it, they implement the oldest defense mechanism, just play off the uncomfortable info and hope it goes away. The people that say my shit is worthless, now they need to ignore me. I don't think sports nerds are worthless, I think they are gross, easily entertained, sheep acting examples of the 20th century human being.

6. If you haven't noticed numbered responses make it very hard to just yack about anything and make a bunch of statements that don't mean shit like you did above.

7. I don't wonder at all and clearly you don't understand the obv either (not that I expected you to). What do you think is going to be the general response to someone who doesn't give a fuck about clicks, doesn't get into a bunch of verbal dick sucking with people he doesn't know, all the while correctly telling everyone that they are sheep and how they fill their time with the lowest form of entertainment possible.