"David became upset and concerned over the blackmail and possible extortion. In response, he posted things on Two Plus Two that are not accurate. While David is certainly eccentric, his life is normal by conventional standards, and is certainly not some sort of sexual monster; and Sue is a fine, intelligent person despite her visual handicaps. But you already knew this, and have known it for a long time. In addition, Two Plus Two will be releasing clarification discussing all of this in the near future."

So David posted stuff in response to this whole story that was inaccurate? And now you will be releasing a clarification discussing this matter in the near future?

Why should we believe the new clarification? Should we not label 4 and all its content a "Liars Site"? Good luck with the clarification Mason, honestly dont bother, why the fuck should we believe you now? Oh wait your 20 year policy of CREDITBILITY! OOPS ALL DOWN THE DRAIN AND U ADMITTED DAVID WAS THE ONE WHO WAS NOT CREDITABLE WITH HIS RESPONSE on your site!

NEVERWIN